Triumvirate's PCB Consulting Services

Subscribe by Email

PCB Remediation Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

PCBs: Environmental Health and Safety Concerns

  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook | Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 

By Kevin Poulin, Account Manager

A potentially significant environmental health and safety concern was brought to the public’s attention this past week in the Boston Sunday Globe. The article written by Beth Daley confirms what many environmental officials have suspected for years, that high levels of PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) are present in many older New England schools. The high levels of PCBs used in the caulking applied to various parts of these buildings are now in a deteriorating condition. Tests have shown PCBs are finding their way into the soils around these buildings in concentrations above the regulatory limit through the weathering process and actual physical pieces falling off of these structures. Some tests are now being conducted to verify if this material is potentially becoming an airborne hazard inside these structures.

PCBs were used primarily in office buildings and schools during the 1960s and 1970s, but were banned in the late 1970s when extensive researched exposed that they may cause cancer. Unfortunately, there are no regulations in place that require schools to test for PCBs. If a school does test for PCBs and the results come back above the regulatory limit of 50 parts per million, the school is required to address the problem. Although the schools can choose not to test for PCBs, they may be jeopardizing the health and safety of their students and faculty.

EPA has mandated remediation projects at several New England Universities. At least two others have done abatement projects on their own. However, the majority of schools are waiting until further guidance or regulations are put in place.

Many of these institutions are struggling with the decision to address this issue from an ethical, and health/safety point of view. If a school decides to test for PCBs in building components and results demonstrate their presence, the costs associated with the solution can be overwhelming. The only EPA-approved abatement methods include the removal of the infrastructure that has come in contact with the PCB-laden material. This has caused abatement projects in individual buildings to cost millions.

These institutions are one of New England’s most valuable resources, which directly and indirectly make up a huge part of our local economy. Many schools are already struggling in this down economy. On the other side of the equation is the already enormous cost for students and their families who are attending these institutions. We cannot afford to place any more stress on these resources that help define the New England area in so many ways. On the other hand, the colleges and universities along with EPA, need to find a practical solution to look beyond the money and realize that their first priority should be the people who work, live, and attend school there. Perhaps they should look to the lessons learned from the last evil spirit called asbestos.

Triumvirate Environmental has been actively engaged on this issue for the past 5 years with policy/strategy development, testing programs, project/remediation management, as well as developing innovative, cost-saving remedial approaches. Contact us today for information or assistance on this issue.

Comments

You're wasting your time, energy & angst. PCBs do NOT cause cancer. They were used because the are stable being essentially inert--meaning they are little more dangerous than helium. The only danger is to your pocketbook and pricey, ineffective remediation,
Posted @ Thursday, October 15, 2009 7:28 AM by Paul Johnson
 
 
You are correct that PCBs are a very large molecule and a relatively stable material. This property and its ability to absorb heat made it a widely used material to enhance the safety of certain products, like electrical equipment. In the case of the caulking materials it greatly improved the elasticity of the material. 
 
However there are many studies that have linked adverse health effects of PCBs on humans, animals and the environment. Why else would EPA have banned the use of this material in this country and regulate the disposal.  
 
This is just one of hundreds of links that you get when you Google this topic, http://www.foxriverwatch.com/cancer_pcb_pcbs_1.html#online. 
 
No one knows for sure what health effects people may have from potentially being exposed to the PCB laden caulking material used in these buildings where people worked or lived for years.  
 
There are groups that are now testing employees to see if this material is showing up in their blood in concentrations higher than what you would normally find in humans because of their potential exposure. They will then be tasked with seeing or proving what effects that this may have had on these employees. These labor groups would potentially use this to lobby for or demand that actions be taken to correct this situation. 
 
Because there isn't sufficient data or studies on this situation EPA has given us some basic guidelines to help manage this issue, while more data is obtained to produce regulations.  
 
You are correct in your statement that this can be an expensive issue to correct.  
 
In regards to ineffective remediation. We have performed several successful remediation projects with analytical results to back it up. We also believe that remediation may not always be the best management practice (BMP).  
 
In some cases where the material is identified and testing (air quality and soil concentrations) has shown that the levels are within the regulatory guidelines, that a maintenance and monitoring program could be the BMP.  
 
This is same practice used for asbestos, if you have a plan to manage it and there is no direct negative health or environmental issues you leave it in place and maintain it. 
 
We currently have one cleaning/encapsulation project for PCB Caulking on the table awaiting EPA approval.  
 
Each situation needs to properly evaluated to determine the BMP. 
 
Posted @ Wednesday, November 11, 2009 12:38 PM by Kevin Poulin
I stand by my comments. Remediation a waste of time and money. Were any of the studies even remotely correct we should be seeing a pandemic of cancers. But we aren't. Proving my point.
Posted @ Wednesday, November 11, 2009 12:50 PM by Paul Johnson
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics