Triumvirate's PCB Consulting Services

PCB Testing, Removal & Remediation Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

PCBs In Schools Overload: How Much Info is Too Much?

  
  
  

Craig Sasse PCB Remediation Expertby Craig Sasse, Senior Engineer

In 2008, we began hearing more about PCBs in school building caulk and their potential hazards; yet at that time, there was very little testing done, no mandates from the EPA, and therefore no action items.  Fast forward to the Summer of 2010, and we were smack dab in middle of a groundswell of media surrounding PCBs:  Suggestions on what to do/what not to do, various EPA guidance including the addition of florescent light ballast to the mix, parents worried about children safety, blogs and seminars with tons of information, etc.  This morning, I did a search for PCBs in Caulk and the search engine returned 16,000 results.  So, the information is out there for the taking, albeit cumbersome and reiterative.

When I get asked to speak on the issue of PCBs in building caulk, I can talk about my expertise with assessment, disposal and best management practices, but when asked about new information, well, there isn’t any.  So why is there so much talk without any action? 

Until Congress updates TSCA, we need to take a step back and address issues at our reach.  Keep in mind:

  • The current understanding, regulatory environment, human exposure risk are dynamic and volatile.  The EPA is conducting pilot studies to better understand the issue and develop future guidance.  Arm yourself with knowledge.  An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. 
  • Know the issues and how it may impact you and your facilities.  Make sure you know who is sampling and analyzing building materials.  Property purchases, building demolition or renovations with structures construction before 1979 could have PCB-containing building materials subject to TSCA management and liability. 
  • There are actions that can be taken to minimize potential PCB exposures to building occupants which are proactive and contend with a major concern.

If we can’t official act, we shouldn’t overreact.  These are significant issues and ignoring it will lead to costly and time consuming mitigation and unnecessary exposures.  Thoughtful and measured responses to the issue shall begin to bring about a reasonable outcome.

Comments

You are right about this being a field with few guiding principles. When EPA promulgated the 1998 PCB "Mega-Rule" they really had no idea that they were opening the flood gates to the problem of PCBs in old building materials. Their goal with this rule change was to prompt the faster removal of PCBs from electrical equipment, and to remove what some saw as a TSCA exemption to cleaning up pre-1978 spills. Unfortunately, the law of unintended consequences has turned the Mega-Rule changes upside down and public school systems are the victims of EPA's poorly thought through policies. 
 
It is good to see Triumvirate playing such an active role in helping people sort out this problem.
Posted @ Sunday, August 28, 2011 9:43 AM by Jim Okun
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics